Skull and Bones
This research page compiles publicly available information about Skull and Bones and their place in the broader Jeffrey Epstein connection graph. People may appear here either because they are mentioned in one or more evidence items (such as flight logs, emails, legal records or credible public reporting), or because reliable public sources document relationships or affiliations that link them to others in this network.
Some profiles therefore track individuals who may be several steps removed — sometimes up to six degrees of separation — from Jeffrey Epstein himself. They are included so researchers can see whether those names later recur in other documents, networks, or investigations. Listing Skull and Bones here is not, by itself, a statement of guilt or innocence.
Use the network graph, shortest-path view, and evidence links below to explore how this person connects to others in the dataset and to Jeffrey Epstein.
Wikipedia Information 
Skull and Bones is an American undergraduate senior society at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. Established in 1832, it is the oldest senior-class society at the university and is considered one of the “Big Three” and “Ancient Eight” at Yale University. Skull and Bones has become a cultural institution known for its powerful alumni and conspiracy theories.
- Skull and Bones
- John Kerry
- Jeffrey Epstein
Closest Connections
- John Kerry — member of — Weak
Evidence
- Skull and Bones (Other) 0
Click a name to highlight 1° / 2° / 3° rings. Edge thickness indicates connection strength. Use Tab to focus and arrow keys to navigate.
The presence of Skull and Bones in this dataset should be understood in a research and mapping context only. The project traces publicly documented relationships and degrees of separation — sometimes several steps removed — to see whether particular names recur across different evidence sets over time.
A person may therefore appear here because they are directly mentioned in documents, because they have a publicly reported relationship or affiliation with others in the network, or because they sit several links away in a chain of acquaintances. Inclusion alone does not imply criminal conduct, moral judgment, or endorsement.