Rinaldo Rizzo

Jeffrey Epstein and Rinaldo Rizzo: What the Witness Testimony Actually Shows

Fast facts about the Jeffrey Epstein – Rinaldo Rizzo connection

• Rinaldo A. Rizzo is described in court records as a private chef and household manager who worked for billionaire hedge-fund investor Glenn Dubin and his wife, Eva Andersson-Dubin.

• Rizzo’s name enters the Epstein record through a sworn deposition in the Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell civil case, where he appears as a witness, not as a defendant.

• In that testimony, Rizzo recounts what a distressed 15-year-old Swedish girl told him and his wife about being on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island with Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen and being asked for sex.

• Unsealed “Epstein files” and Maxwell-related documents list Rizzo as the Dubins’ private chef and cite his account of the Swedish girl’s allegations; he is treated as an employee of Epstein’s associates and a source of information, not as a co-conspirator.

• There is no public evidence that Rinaldo Rizzo was a social friend, business partner, or legal associate of Jeffrey Epstein. The documented link is that he worked for people in Epstein’s circle and later gave key witness testimony about what a teenager told him.

Who is Rinaldo Rizzo?

Rinaldo A. Rizzo is a career “private service” professional. In his own sworn testimony, he explains that he works in domestic service and household management for wealthy families, overseeing staff and helping run large homes. For a period of time, he worked for hedge-fund billionaire Glenn Dubin and his wife, physician Eva Andersson-Dubin.

The Dubins have been repeatedly named in Jeffrey Epstein coverage as long-time friends and social associates of Epstein. That is the context in which Rizzo’s name appears: he was part of the household staff for a family with documented social ties to Epstein, and he later described what he saw and heard inside their home.

From a “how to read Epstein document dumps” perspective, it is important to underline that Rizzo appears in the files as staff and as a witness. He is not presented as a powerful financier, politician, or recruiter. His role is to describe what a frightened teenager told him, and how that story intersected with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Why Rinaldo Rizzo’s name appears in the Epstein and Maxwell files

Rizzo’s main entry into the public record comes through:

• A videotaped deposition in the Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell civil case, later unsealed.

• References in media reporting on those unsealed documents, especially coverage of a 15-year-old Swedish girl who allegedly came from Epstein’s private island to the Dubin home.

• Mentions in more recent unsealed “Epstein files” where his testimony is summarized as part of the broader picture of Epstein’s network and alleged trafficking.

In these sources, Rizzo is always framed as:

• A private chef/household manager employed by Glenn and Eva Dubin.

• A witness who describes a single, intense encounter with a distressed teenager.

• Someone who, in his own words, did not previously tell others about his interactions related to Epstein until the Giuffre/Maxwell litigation forced everything into the open.

There is no indication in these records that Rizzo was paid by Epstein, traveled on Epstein’s planes, appeared in Epstein’s “little black book,” or took part in any criminal enterprise. He is a supporting player whose testimony sheds light on alleged abuse by others.

The 15-year-old Swedish girl: what Rizzo says he was told

The most widely discussed part of Rinaldo Rizzo’s deposition involves a 15-year-old Swedish girl who came to the Dubins’ New York home.

According to Rizzo’s sworn account, the girl:

• Arrived at the Dubin household visibly distraught.

• Had no passport and no phone in her possession.

• Was “literally quivering,” with her head down, and appeared deeply traumatized.

Rizzo testifies that the girl “blurted out” her story to him and his wife, not as a calm conversation, but in a rushed and emotional way. As he recounts it, she said:

• She had been on “the island,” referring to Epstein’s private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands.

• Ghislaine Maxwell and Epstein assistant Sarah Kellen were there.

• She was asked for sex and said no.

• She did not know how she had gotten from the island to New York.

• Before she arrived at the Dubins’ home, she had been threatened by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell not to talk about what had happened.

Rizzo further states that, when he asked whether she had a passport or phone, the girl told him that Sarah Kellen had taken her documents and phone and given them to Ghislaine Maxwell. According to his sworn recollection, the girl said she had been threatened again not to speak about the sexual demands she described.

Key points for an “Epstein files research methodology”:

• Rizzo is not describing something he personally witnessed on the island. He is relaying what the girl said to him and his wife.

• The girl’s statements are allegations. They are serious, but they are still someone’s account, reported second-hand through a witness.

• Rizzo’s description has been treated as significant by courts and journalists because it echoes other patterns alleged by Epstein accusers (confiscated passports, isolation on the island, threats, and demands for sex).

Responsible writing about this episode should keep those distinctions clear: this is testimony about a victim’s words, not direct eyewitness testimony to acts on the island.

Rizzo’s employment by the Dubins and the indirect link to Epstein

Rinaldo Rizzo worked inside the Dubin household, not inside any Epstein property. His description of his own job includes:

• Managing or supporting household staff.

• Coordinating day-to-day domestic service.

• Working closely with the family in a private-service role.

The Dubins, meanwhile, are widely reported as having:

• A long social relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

• Hosted him at times at their homes.

• Been the subject of subpoenas and questions in the broader Epstein investigations.

It is in that context that the Swedish girl appears at their home and tells her story to Rizzo and his wife. Rizzo’s testimony suggests:

• The girl viewed the Dubin home as a place where she might be safer or at least away from the island.

• She felt able, in that moment, to speak to the household staff about what she had just experienced.

For search phrases like “Rinaldo Rizzo Epstein testimony,” “Dubin chef Swedish girl story,” or “witness accounts in Epstein files,” this is the core narrative that the documents support.

How later document releases and media use Rizzo’s testimony

As more Maxwell and Epstein-related documents were unsealed, Rinaldo Rizzo’s deposition became a recurring reference point:

• Lists of unsealed names identify him as Glenn Dubin’s former private chef or private chef and house manager.

• News stories summarizing the “Epstein files” highlight his testimony as one of the clearest accounts from an employee inside the orbit of Epstein’s wealthy friends.

• Commentaries on Glenn Dubin’s ties to Epstein often bring in Rizzo’s description of the Swedish girl as part of the factual background, even as the Dubins strongly deny wrongdoing.

Rizzo himself is not portrayed as an accuser against Epstein in the sense of being a victim. Instead, he is a witness whose job gave him proximity to people who were close to Epstein, and who says he heard and saw signs of distress in at least one alleged victim.

From a research-methods point of view, this is a textbook example of how household staff can become crucial witnesses in high-profile abuse cases, even though they are not central figures in the public narrative.

What the public record does not show about Rinaldo Rizzo and Epstein

Equally important for careful, non-defaming coverage is what is missing from the Epstein–Rizzo connection:

• No criminal charge names Rinaldo Rizzo as a co-conspirator in Epstein’s trafficking scheme.

• He does not appear in reporting as having recruited girls, arranged travel for victims, or profited from Epstein’s alleged abuse.

• There is no public evidence that he traveled on Epstein’s planes, stayed on Epstein’s properties as a guest, or had a business partnership with him.

• His name appears in unsealed court files as a witness whose sworn account is used to understand the conduct of others, especially Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and the Dubins’ relationship with Epstein.

For readers searching “Epstein files research methodology” or “how to read Epstein document dumps,” this is an important lesson: not every name in the files is an associate, client, or enabler. Some are witnesses, staff, or people who tried to make sense of what they saw.

How to interpret the Rinaldo Rizzo testimony in Epstein document dumps

If you are building a careful way to read and classify names in the Epstein archive, the Rizzo example highlights several rules of thumb:

1. Identify the person’s role

Rizzo appears as:

• A household employee in private service.

• A witness in a civil case.

He does not appear as a financier, politician, or member of Epstein’s core inner circle.

2. Separate direct observation from reported speech

In his deposition, Rizzo:

• Directly observes the Swedish girl’s emotional state: crying, quivering, without passport or phone.

• Relays her statements about Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Sarah Kellen.

The direct observations and the reported speech are both valuable, but they answer different questions. An honest article makes that difference clear.

3. Note how testimony fits broader patterns, without over-claiming

The Swedish girl’s story, as told by Rizzo, lines up with other accounts of:

• Confiscated travel documents.

• Young girls transported to Epstein’s island.

• Threats not to talk about sex or abuse.

This pattern-matching is important, but it does not turn Rizzo into an insider or accomplice. It shows he is one of several witnesses whose stories fit into a larger mosaic.

4. Use careful SEO language to avoid guilt by association

When writing for search, it is safer and more accurate to use descriptive phrases such as:

• “Rinaldo Rizzo Epstein testimony explained”

• “Dubin chef and Swedish girl story in the Epstein files”

• “how to read Epstein document dumps for witness accounts”

These longer, more precise keywords can attract readers who are looking for clarity, while avoiding short, misleading phrases that might suggest wrongdoing where none is documented.

What the public record shows about Epstein and Rinaldo Rizzo

Putting everything together, the documented connection between Jeffrey Epstein and Rinaldo Rizzo looks like this:

• Rizzo worked as a private chef and household manager for billionaire Glenn Dubin and his wife, Eva Andersson-Dubin, who have acknowledged a past friendship with Epstein while denying wrongdoing.

• In a sworn deposition, Rizzo recounts a troubling encounter with a 15-year-old Swedish girl in the Dubin home. According to his account, the girl said she had just come from Epstein’s island, that Ghislaine Maxwell and Sarah Kellen had taken her passport and phone, and that she had been asked for sex and threatened not to talk about it.

• Unsealed Epstein and Maxwell files, as well as later news stories, treat Rizzo as an important witness whose testimony supports claims of trafficking and coercion by Epstein and Maxwell, but they do not portray him as an abuser or co-conspirator.

• There is no public evidence that Rinaldo Rizzo had a personal, business, or legal partnership with Jeffrey Epstein. His role in the record is that of an employee of Epstein’s associates who later gave detailed testimony about what a young alleged victim told him.

For researchers, journalists, and readers, the most accurate way to describe the Epstein–Rizzo link is simple: Rinaldo Rizzo is a private-service professional whose sworn account provides a vivid, second-hand window into alleged abuse connected to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, without implying that Rizzo himself participated in or benefited from those crimes.