Guidelines & Rules
???? Mission
This site maps documented connections and degrees of separation related to Jeffrey Epstein. Inclusion ≠ allegation or endorsement. We focus on verifiable relationships, not accusations.
???? Non-Partisan Scope
This is a mapping project, not a political forum. Submissions framed as “because they’re a Democrat/Republican” or partisan campaigning are off-topic and will be removed. Repeat violations may result in a ban.
???? What to Submit
✅ Required Elements:
- Who: Names of people/organizations involved
- How: Type of connection (flight, event, business, etc.)
- Where & When: Location and date(s) if known
- Source: Original URL to reliable source
- Archive: Wayback Machine or Perma.cc link
???? Acceptable Source Types (by weight):
- Court filings: Legal documents, depositions, case records
- Law enforcement: Police reports, FBI documents, official investigations
- Major news: Established newspapers, news networks with editorial standards
- Books with citations: Published works with verifiable sources
- Primary materials: Flight logs, photos, meeting records with clear provenance
????️ Privacy & Safety
???? Strictly Prohibited (Doxxing):
- Private home addresses
- Personal phone numbers or emails
- Social Security numbers or IDs
- Non-public family member information
- Private business/personal correspondence
Note: Business addresses, official contact info, and public professional details are generally acceptable if relevant and sourced.
???? How Voting Works
Community members vote on evidence quality. Connection strength is calculated using:
- Wilson score confidence interval: Balances upvotes vs. downvotes
- Source type weighting: Court documents count more than news articles
- Time decay: Newer evidence weighted slightly higher
- Display: Strong (0.7+) / Moderate (0.4-0.7) / Weak (0.0-0.4)
???? Reporting & Moderation
Use the “Report” button for:
- Partisan framing: Political bias in neutral content
- Unsourced claims: Missing or invalid sources
- Privacy/doxxing: Personal information exposure
- Harassment: Targeting individuals inappropriately
???? Examples
✅ Good Submissions:
Connection: “Prince Andrew photographed with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell”
Source: BBC News article from 2019 + Wayback archive
Why good: Factual, sourced, neutral language, verifiable
❌ Bad Submissions:
Example 1: “Bill Gates is suspicious because he’s a Democrat who donated to Clinton”
Why bad: Partisan framing, implies guilt by association
Example 2: “I heard Person X was at the island but can’t prove it”
Why bad: Unsourced, hearsay, potentially defamatory
Questions? Contact us through the Takedown & Appeals page.