Stacey Plaskett

Stacey Plaskett and Jeffrey Epstein: What the Documents Actually Show

Fast facts

• Who is Stacey Plaskett?
  Stacey Plaskett is the non-voting Democratic delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives from the U.S. Virgin Islands, a jurisdiction where Jeffrey Epstein lived, owned two private islands, and committed many of his crimes.

• Text messages during a 2019 House hearing:
  Newly released documents from Epstein’s estate include text messages between Plaskett and Jeffrey Epstein during the Feb. 27, 2019 House Oversight Committee hearing with Michael Cohen. Epstein texted her before and during the hearing about possible lines of questioning; Plaskett says Epstein was a constituent and denies taking “advice” from him.

• Real-time contact while Epstein watched the hearing:
  A Washington Post analysis matched timestamps from the Cohen hearing with the texts and found that Epstein appeared to be watching live, commenting on witnesses (including Trump aide Rhona Graff) and praising Plaskett’s questioning.

• Political donations in the Virgin Islands:
  An investigation into Epstein’s political giving reported that he donated significant sums to politicians in the U.S. Virgin Islands, including Plaskett, reflecting his long-standing effort to cultivate influence where his primary residence was located.

• No criminal charges against Plaskett in the Epstein cases:
  Despite the controversy over texts and campaign donations, Plaskett has not been charged with any crime related to Epstein. A House Republican attempt to censure her over the texts failed in November 2025.

Who is Stacey Plaskett and why does she show up in the Epstein story?

Stacey Plaskett is the elected delegate representing the U.S. Virgin Islands in the U.S. House of Representatives. Though she cannot vote on final passage of legislation, she sits on major committees and has played visible roles in high-profile hearings, including acting as a House manager in Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial.

The U.S. Virgin Islands are central to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Epstein owned Little Saint James and Great Saint James islands there and used the territory as a base of operations for years. A settlement between the Epstein estate and the Virgin Islands Department of Justice states that many of his crimes took place on Little Saint James.

Because Plaskett represents the very jurisdiction where Epstein lived and offended, researchers and journalists have paid special attention to any documented contacts between the two.

The 2019 Michael Cohen hearing and the Epstein–Plaskett texts

Context: a high-profile Oversight hearing

On February 27, 2019, Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s former lawyer, testified before the House Oversight Committee. The hearing was a major political event, broadcast live and closely watched across the country. Plaskett, then a member of the committee, questioned Cohen during the session.

Years later, a trove of documents from Epstein’s estate was released, including text messages. Among them were exchanges between Epstein and Plaskett that took place on the day of the Cohen hearing.

What the texts show, according to released documents

According to the Washington Post analysis of those messages and the hearing timeline:

• Pre-hearing contact:
  Plaskett texted Epstein early in the morning before the hearing began. In one message she noted that Cohen would talk about his school grades, signaling that she was aware Epstein was tracking the event.

• Epstein suggests a line of questioning:
  Epstein replied by raising a question about what legal privilege might justify not releasing college transcripts, a topic that overlapped with Republican interest in Trump’s academic records.

• Real-time commentary during the hearing:
  As the hearing unfolded, the two exchanged additional texts. Epstein asked when it would be Plaskett’s turn to question Cohen and commented on Cohen’s references to other Trump associates.

• The Rhona Graff exchange:
  When Cohen mentioned longtime Trump assistant Rhona Graff, Epstein texted Plaskett, calling her “RONA – keeper of the secrets” (misspelling her name). Plaskett replied asking what “RONA” meant; Epstein clarified that Cohen meant Trump’s assistant. Moments later, Plaskett questioned Cohen and then received a “Good work” message from Epstein.

The pattern of messages suggests that Epstein was following the hearing live and offering reactions and prompts as Plaskett prepared to question Cohen. The texts have been interpreted by critics as evidence that Epstein may have influenced some of her questioning. Supporters counter that elected officials often receive rapid-fire input from many people during televised hearings and that the messages do not prove she relied on his suggestions.

Plaskett’s explanation of the Epstein texts

On the House floor, Plaskett addressed the controversy directly after Republicans introduced a resolution to censure her over the messages.

Key points from her explanation include:

• Epstein as a constituent:
  Plaskett described Epstein as one of many constituents who contacted her. As a resident and major landowner in the Virgin Islands, Epstein fell within her district.

• Large volume of incoming messages:
  She said that once the Cohen hearing started, she began receiving “innumerable texts” from different individuals, including Epstein, offering suggestions and commentary.

• Denial that she needed “advice”:
  Plaskett argued that she did not rely on Epstein to learn how to question Cohen, stressing her long experience as a lawyer and prosecutor. She compared Epstein’s messages to information she might gather from confidential informants or other sources while pursuing the truth.

• No finding of rule violations:
  She also noted that she has not been found to have violated House rules or any law in connection with the texts.

The censure resolution ultimately failed, with all Democrats present voting against it and a handful of Republicans declining to support the punishment.

Campaign donations and Epstein’s political influence in the Virgin Islands

Years before the text messages became public, reporters had already raised concerns about Epstein’s political spending in the Virgin Islands. An investigative report found that Epstein contributed substantial amounts of money to Virgin Islands politicians across party lines, including donations to Stacey Plaskett.

These donations fit a broader pattern:

• Epstein was a registered sex offender but continued to cultivate relationships with local officials.

• His businesses and properties in the Virgin Islands depended on favorable regulatory treatment and political goodwill.

• Contributions to campaigns, charities, and political committees often appeared alongside efforts to shape how he was treated by local authorities.

It is important to emphasize what is and is not documented:

• Documented:
  Epstein made donations that benefited Plaskett’s political career.

• Not documented:
  There is no public evidence that Plaskett changed official positions or took legislative action in exchange for Epstein’s money.

• Mixed record:
  After Epstein’s 2019 arrest and subsequent death, officials in the Virgin Islands—including prosecutors and other political leaders—pursued civil actions against his estate and the banks that handled his money. Plaskett has at times defended the territory’s broader response while also facing scrutiny over past donations and contacts.

Presence in other Epstein files: what researchers have (and have not) found

When people talk about the “Epstein files,” they usually mean a mix of:

• Flight logs from Epstein’s private planes

• Contact books and address lists

• Court filings and deposition transcripts

• Evidence from criminal and civil cases

• Recently released email and text archives from Epstein’s estate or from congressional investigations

As of now, the most clearly documented connections between Epstein and Stacey Plaskett are:

1. Text messages on the day of the 2019 Michael Cohen hearing, described and analyzed by major news outlets using documents from Epstein’s estate.

2. Campaign donations routed from Epstein and his entities to political figures in the Virgin Islands, including Plaskett, as reported in investigative coverage.

By contrast, public reporting has not established:

• That Plaskett ever traveled on Epstein’s planes.

• That her name appears in the most widely circulated versions of Epstein’s “black book” of contacts.

• That she was involved in Epstein’s business entities, shell companies, or investment structures.

• That she participated in, or had knowledge of, Epstein’s trafficking crimes.

This distinction matters. The available documents show communication and political donations. They do not show her involvement in criminal conduct.

Rumors, theories, and what remains unproven

Because Epstein’s name carries enormous scandal, almost any documented link can fuel speculation online. In Plaskett’s case, the main points of rumor and debate include:

• The idea that Epstein “directed” her questions at the Cohen hearing:
  The text messages do show him offering suggestions and reacting in real time. Whether that rose to the level of directing her is a matter of interpretation. Plaskett firmly rejects the idea that she took instructions from him.

• Speculation about a deeper, undisclosed relationship:
  Some commentators argue that texts and donations point to a closer relationship than has been admitted. So far, however, no additional documents—such as extensive email chains, joint business records, or travel logs—have been produced to substantiate that claim.

• Questions about ethics and judgment rather than criminality:
  Even critics in Congress have tended to frame the issue as one of judgment—whether a member of Congress should be in contact with Epstein during official work—rather than alleging a specific crime. The failed censure resolution itself cited “serious questions” about judgment rather than pointing to a statutory violation.

No court has found that Plaskett committed wrongdoing related to Epstein. No law-enforcement agency has publicly announced an investigation into her conduct in connection with Epstein’s crimes.

How to read the Epstein–Plaskett connection responsibly

For readers trying to make sense of these revelations, a careful method helps separate evidence from assumption:

1. Start with what the documents actually show
   The texts show communication on a specific day in 2019, centered on a high-profile hearing. Campaign-finance reports show donations tied to Epstein. Those are firm points.

2. Note the context of each appearance
   In this case, the context is a congressional hearing and routine political fundraising—not flight manifests or sealed criminal exhibits.

3. Distinguish ethical questions from criminal accusations
   One can debate whether it was appropriate for a member of Congress to communicate with a convicted sex offender during a hearing. That is different from alleging participation in trafficking or financial crime.

4. Include the subject’s own explanation
   Plaskett’s statements on the House floor, where she describes Epstein as a constituent and denies being “advised” by him, are part of the public record and should be weighed alongside the raw messages.

Summary: what we can honestly say about Stacey Plaskett and Jeffrey Epstein

Based on the current public record, a balanced, evidence-based summary looks like this:

• Jeffrey Epstein lived and offended in the U.S. Virgin Islands, the territory Stacey Plaskett represents in Congress.

• Epstein and Plaskett exchanged text messages during the February 27, 2019 House Oversight hearing with Michael Cohen. In those messages, Epstein commented on the hearing in real time and raised potential lines of questioning; Plaskett responded and later questioned Cohen.

• Investigative reporting has found that Epstein donated substantial funds to Virgin Islands politicians, including Plaskett, as part of his broader effort to build political influence where his properties were located.

• Plaskett denies that she relied on Epstein for advice, describes him as a constituent among many, and has not been charged with any crime related to Epstein. A House GOP effort to censure her over the texts failed.

• There is currently no public evidence that Plaskett participated in Epstein’s trafficking operations, traveled on his planes, or shared ownership in his companies. The documented connection is one of communication and political donations, not a proven business partnership or criminal collaboration.

For researchers and readers of the Epstein archives, the Stacey Plaskett example is a reminder that a name in the documents—even in texts that raise serious questions—must still be understood in context, and that ethical controversy is not the same thing as criminal guilt.

Stacey Plaskett

Share this page: X / Twitter · Facebook · Reddit

This research page compiles publicly available information about Stacey Plaskett and their place in the broader Jeffrey Epstein connection graph. People may appear here either because they are mentioned in one or more evidence items (such as flight logs, emails, legal records or credible public reporting), or because reliable public sources document relationships or affiliations that link them to others in this network.

Some profiles therefore track individuals who may be several steps removed — sometimes up to six degrees of separation — from Jeffrey Epstein himself. They are included so researchers can see whether those names later recur in other documents, networks, or investigations. Listing Stacey Plaskett here is not, by itself, a statement of guilt or innocence.

Use the network graph, shortest-path view, and evidence links below to explore how this person connects to others in the dataset and to Jeffrey Epstein.

Wikipedia Information

Stacey Elizabeth Plaskett is an American politician and attorney serving since 2015 as the delegate to the United States House of Representatives from the United States Virgin Islands’ at-large congressional district. Plaskett has practiced law in New York City, Washington, D.C., and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

Categories: 1966 births 20th-century African-American politicians 20th-century African-American women politicians 20th-century American women politicians 21st-century African-American lawyers

Read full article on Wikipedia ↗ | Last updated: Jan 12, 2026

Shortest path to Jeffrey Epstein: 1 degree(s)

1. Stacey Plaskett
2. Jeffrey Epstein

Closest Connections

• Jeffrey Epstein — Other — Weak ▲ ▼ Add Source Report

Radius (degrees of separation): 12345 Filter by name Center Reset

Click a name to highlight 1° / 2° / 3° rings. Edge thickness indicates connection strength. Use Tab to focus and arrow keys to navigate.

Explore this person in the network graph