Jeffrey Epstein and Christina Galbraith: What the Documents Show About Their Public-Relations Relationship

Fast facts about the Jeffrey Epstein – Christina Galbraith connection

• Christina Galbraith is described in multiple news reports as a publicist who worked for Jeffrey Epstein and his Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation in the early 2010s.

• Press releases about the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation list “Christina Galbraith” as the media or foundation contact, often with a New York phone number and foundation branding.

• Epstein-related email caches include numerous messages between Epstein and Galbraith, and between Galbraith and outside consultants, where her signature line reads “MEDIA/PR – Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation” or similar wording.

• In these emails, Galbraith discusses strategies to push down negative search results about Epstein and to highlight content portraying him as a science philanthropist, including consulting with outside reputation-management firms.

• A now-removed article in the magazine National Review praising Epstein’s “passion for cutting-edge science” was credited to Christina Galbraith; later reporting identified her as Epstein’s publicist rather than an independent commentator.

• Reproductions of Epstein’s 1990s contact book (the so-called “black book”) list a “Christina Galbraith” among many names; this functions as a contact entry and is not, on its own, evidence of criminal conduct.

• There is no public record that Christina Galbraith has been charged with any Epstein-related crime. The documents show a professional role in media and image-management, not direct involvement in Epstein’s abuse.

Who is Christina Galbraith in the Epstein record?

In the publicly available material, Christina Galbraith appears as a communications and media professional tied to Epstein’s philanthropic operations, not as a social acquaintance or victim.

Several press releases about the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation list her as the contact person, sometimes with a title indicating she represents the foundation in media matters. These releases promote donations to science and education projects, such as support for artificial intelligence work, Harvard-linked initiatives, or international fellowships.

Later commentary about the Epstein scandal identifies Galbraith more directly as Epstein’s publicist. Articles examining how Epstein tried to rebuild his reputation after his 2008 conviction note that a positive piece about him was written under her byline and that she worked on his “science philanthropist” image.

Taken together, the press releases and media coverage indicate that Christina Galbraith functioned as a communications point person for the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation and for Epstein’s attempts to present himself as a major supporter of scientific research.

Emails that show Epstein’s media/PR operation

Epstein-related email troves, including material released via investigations and oversight requests, add more detail to this relationship. In those archives, multiple documents show direct exchanges between Epstein and an address linked to Christina Galbraith, as well as chains involving Galbraith, Epstein, and outside consultants.

Patterns in those messages include:

Clear media/PR role

Several emails show signature blocks for “Christina Galbraith – MEDIA/PR – Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation.” In some messages she is the sender; in others, she is copied on correspondence between Epstein and digital-marketing or public-relations consultants. Her role is explicitly framed as media and public-relations support.

“High profile” and reputation concerns

At least one thread with a subject line along the lines of “High Profile” shows Epstein writing to Galbraith about how he is seen in public, with responses focused on managing his image. The emphasis is on search results, press coverage, and reputation, not on legal strategy.

Work with outside consultants

Galbraith appears alongside consultants who specialize in online reputation and search-engine visibility. These exchanges discuss “boosting” strategies, which usually means:

• Creating and promoting neutral or positive content about Epstein.

• Trying to reduce the visibility of negative or critical stories in search results.

• Monitoring how often certain news pieces appear when people search his name.

In one message, Galbraith passes along a summary of services proposed by a reputation-management company, including rough costs and time frames. This shows she was involved in evaluating and relaying options designed to reshape Epstein’s presence online.

These emails support the conclusion that Christina Galbraith’s documented role in Epstein’s inner circle was as a media and communications professional, helping oversee or coordinate efforts to manage how he appeared in search results and in the press after his conviction.

Pro-Epstein articles and the science-philanthropy narrative

After Epstein’s 2008 conviction and brief jail term in Florida, he launched a public-relations campaign to recast himself as a patron of science and education. That campaign used a mix of donations, conferences, and flattering coverage highlighting his interest in research.

Within that effort, Christina Galbraith appears in several ways:

Bylined pro-Epstein article

A 2013 article in National Review portrayed Epstein in a positive light, emphasizing his business success and his backing of mathematical and scientific research. The article ran under the byline “Christina Galbraith” and described her as a science writer.

Later, other outlets reported that Galbraith was in fact working as Epstein’s publicist at the time. The magazine eventually removed the piece and acknowledged that it had been part of a broader PR push to “pitch a new narrative” for Epstein after his sex-offense conviction.

Related content on other platforms

The same PR push appears to have produced similar pieces on other sites, including business and opinion platforms, that presented Epstein as an important supporter of science while downplaying or ignoring his criminal history. Commentators who later reviewed these articles noted that they relied heavily on information and framing supplied by Epstein’s public-relations team, which included Galbraith.

Promotion of the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation

Press releases naming Galbraith as the contact promote the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation’s gifts to universities, research programs, and international initiatives. The language used in those releases mirrors the themes that later appear in the bylined articles: Epstein as a serious thinker, a patron of scientists, and a sponsor of “cutting-edge” work.

This part of the record shows a professional relationship where Galbraith helped author, place, or support messaging that emphasized Epstein’s philanthropy and deemphasized his status as a convicted sex offender. It does not, by itself, establish what she knew about his underlying crimes or about allegations that had not yet become public.

Mentions in contact books and other files

Beyond emails and press coverage, Christina Galbraith’s name also appears in at least one reproduction of Epstein’s contact book, sometimes called his “black book.” In that listing, her name appears in a long roster of contacts, alongside many other individuals from various industries.

A name in such a book can indicate anything from a close working relationship to a one-time networking contact. In Galbraith’s case, the other records—press releases, email signatures, and media reports—support the interpretation that she was associated with the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation and served in a media or communications capacity.

There is no public indication that she appears in passenger flight logs for Epstein’s planes, and her presence in the record is concentrated in PR, online-reputation, and foundation-branding contexts.

How to read this kind of connection in the Epstein files

For people trying to learn how to read Epstein document dumps or to build a careful Epstein files research methodology, Christina Galbraith is an example of a name that appears around the edges of the scandal in a specific, professional role.

A few key points:

• Appearance is not proof of wrongdoing
  Being listed in an email, press release, or contact book shows some documented connection to Epstein or his organizations. It does not, on its own, show that the person knew about, supported, or took part in his criminal conduct.

• Professional services can be several steps removed from abuse
  The material about Galbraith points to a role in media, communications, and online-reputation work. Many controversial figures hire publicists and PR firms. Those professionals may or may not have full knowledge of all aspects of a client’s life.

• Verify identity and context
  Names can repeat, spellings can vary, and context can be lost when documents are read in isolation. In this case, the combination of a foundation-branded email identity, consistent media contact details, and independent reporting makes it highly likely that the press-release contact, the bylined author, and the PR contact in the emails are the same person.

• Note the absence of criminal charges
  As of the latest public information, Christina Galbraith has not been charged with any crime related to Epstein. The documents show how she fit into the ecosystem around his philanthropy and image-management campaign, not into the criminal indictments.

Summary: What the documented record shows

The available record paints a consistent picture of the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Christina Galbraith:

• She served as a media and public-relations professional for the Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation.

• She was listed as a contact on foundation-branded press releases promoting his science and education donations.

• Emails show her working with Epstein and outside consultants on search-engine and reputation-management strategies to improve his online image.

• She was credited as the author of at least one pro-Epstein article later removed after it became clear that it was part of his PR campaign.

Taken together, these facts support the conclusion that Christina Galbraith’s documented connection to Epstein was primarily professional and PR-oriented. She appears in the emails and files as part of the machinery that tried to reposition Epstein in the public eye as a science philanthropist after his criminal conviction, not as a co-defendant, victim, or accuser.

At the same time, the limits of the documentation are clear. The emails, press releases, and articles show what she did in her public-relations role. They do not reveal her private views, her level of knowledge about Epstein’s crimes, or anything beyond her documented communications work. Any fair reading of the Epstein files should keep that distinction in mind.