Brock Pierce
This research page compiles publicly available information about Brock Pierce and their place in the broader Jeffrey Epstein connection graph. People may appear here either because they are mentioned in one or more evidence items (such as flight logs, emails, legal records or credible public reporting), or because reliable public sources document relationships or affiliations that link them to others in this network.
Some profiles therefore track individuals who may be several steps removed — sometimes up to six degrees of separation — from Jeffrey Epstein himself. They are included so researchers can see whether those names later recur in other documents, networks, or investigations. Listing Brock Pierce here is not, by itself, a statement of guilt or innocence.
Use the network graph, shortest-path view, and evidence links below to explore how this person connects to others in the dataset and to Jeffrey Epstein.
Wikipedia Information 
Brock Jeffrey Pierce is an American entrepreneur in the cryptocurrency industry who co-founded Tether. As a child actor, he starred in the Disney films The Mighty Ducks (1992), D2: The Mighty Ducks (1994), and First Kid (1996).
- Brock Pierce
- Jeffrey Epstein
Closest Connections
- Joi Ito — associated with — Weak
Evidence
- Brock Pierce (Other) 0
- MIT — worked for — Weak
Evidence
- Brock Pierce (Other) 0
- Steve Bannon — former partner — Weak
Evidence
- Brock Pierce (Other) 0
- Bill Clinton — associated with — Weak
Evidence
- Brock Pierce (Other) 0
- Jeffrey Epstein — associated with — Weak
Evidence
- Brock Pierce (Other) 0
Click a name to highlight 1° / 2° / 3° rings. Edge thickness indicates connection strength. Use Tab to focus and arrow keys to navigate.
The presence of Brock Pierce in this dataset should be understood in a research and mapping context only. The project traces publicly documented relationships and degrees of separation — sometimes several steps removed — to see whether particular names recur across different evidence sets over time.
A person may therefore appear here because they are directly mentioned in documents, because they have a publicly reported relationship or affiliation with others in the network, or because they sit several links away in a chain of acquaintances. Inclusion alone does not imply criminal conduct, moral judgment, or endorsement.